Friday, August 30, 2013

Blog #2 - Double Indemnity (3-70)


The novel Double Indemnity by James M. Cain is a work of pure unadulterated literary noir. Within its deceptively brief yet dense pages, tainted by lust, greed and violence, the reader is consumed by the heart of the essentials that necessitate noir. The lead characters of the novel, Walter Huff and Phyllis Nirdlinger, become the triggers of those essentials and the machinations by which they facilitate their plotting and desire become the pieces of tone and mood that make noir the light of fiction that casts itself on the darker aspects of humanity, revealing a cold hard truth.

The article from the website, Filmsite, entitled "Primary Characteristics and Conventions of Film Noir,"  elaborates on the essentials of noir by breaking down some of its composition of mood. The article states, “The primary moods of classic film noir are melancholy, alienation, bleakness, disillusionment, disenchantment, pessimism, ambiguity, moral corruption, evil, guilt and paranoia.” All of these moods are at the forefront, in mind and in hand within Double Indemnity, as the protagonist, Walter Huff, a deceptively bleak insurance agent, finds himself falling deeper and deeper into a nefarious scheme that results in the murder of a man, who is perhaps not entirely virtuous but is, nonetheless, not deserving of death.

In the beginning of the novel, the reader finds Huff to be a man of established enterprise. He works as an insurance agent, knowledgeable and meticulous. However, under the superficial garb of his monotony, he is a character in search of an exit. As he goes about the activities of his profession, he sees the plots and corruption of seemingly ordinary people who are seeking only financial gain. A person on the side of righteousness would default to the action of bringing such deeds to justice. Huff, however, turns a blind eye to the casual disregard of law and ethics and instead lets his cynicism reign in perpetuity. Nevertheless, as with other noted aspects of noir, he lives within the boarders that divide the worlds of right and wrong, of night and day. “The [protagonist] is midway between lawful society and the underworld, walking the brink, sometimes unscrupulous...,” notes Raymond Borde and Etienne Chaumeton in “Towards a Definition of Film Noir.” Huff’s code of ethics may be more personal than societal, but he lives by them with conviction as seen in his pursuits either in the form of an insurance agent or in the form of an artist of murder, “...hitting it for the limit, that’s what I go for. It’s all I go for,” decrees Huff.      

As the story progresses, Huff encounters Phyllis in what some might call a very serendipitous manner. Huff suspects her immediately of duplicity and of not being a woman of much integrity. And yet he is intrigued and attracted to her, riding that line between acceptable and malicious once again. The reader takes note that Phyllis immediately fits the persona of the femme fatale, a key ingredient to any noir narrative. She is mysterious, beautiful, seductive and at the same time willing to commit any act, no mater how unlawful, as long as it fulfills her aims. Huff, being a victim of his own desire, finds himself going along with her.  It’s a felicitous pairing but their fate will most likely be anything but joyful.

Friday, August 23, 2013

Blog #1


Response to question #4

In modern cinematic times it has become the purview of Hollywood to not simply develop people's dreams but to devise and advocate its own dreams upon the people. The men and women behind the curtain in the land of Hollywood are the string pullers and we, the watchers, are their marionettes. These dream makers operate under a broad assumption that most film goers are simply casual participants wanting only a brief and shallow escape from their monotonous existence. Stories of formula are crafted for this reason where predictability is the key because comfort is found in the familiar. This assumption and device of formula is correct in most cases and can be given evidence by the obliteration of the grandeur of the cinema that has occurred gradually over the decades. Cinemas where once places of character, reverie and palace-like design and now they are merely pieces within a corporation where most that attend treat such places with no sense of prestige and a great sense of apathy. Therefore, the comment made by Chris Pula regarding the state of noir in the modern world, has become sadly prophetic. Audiences of late are conditioned to expect the expected. In those fictions crafted by committee, the hero is always virtuous, the good guys always win, and love will always, always conquer all. The characteristics of film noir do not allow for such accommodations. The casual and passive cannot digest their nature of gloom and doom or their blurred lines of morality. And for this reason the genre of film noir is susceptible to only a niche of the film going community, those who view such films as another form of art and who can appreciate the way noir exposes the imperfections of society, shining light upon the dark.